X-Sender: naga ganesan@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 1 3); 21 Dec 2001 15:12:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 11582 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2001 15:12:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Dec 2001 15:12:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n28.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.78) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 2001 15:12:51 -0000
Received: from [216.115.96.40] by n28.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2001 15:12:51 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:12:49 -0000
To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Kavya in South India
Message-ID: <9vvjhh+p3ko@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 546
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "naga ganesan"
X-Originating-IP: 12.13.248.14
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=9040551
X-Yahoo-Profile: naga ganesan
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14151
Dear List,
Dr. Tieken has written a book recently
detailing how the Sangam poems are
only about 1000 years old. Ie.,
CT poems were composed around 9-10th
centuries only, and in an urban
environment, presumably in the Pandyan court.
Prof. Hart commented on why Dr. Tieken's
theory is not valid:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/INDOLOGY/message/1807
Dr. Tieken has responded that CT poems
are only late compositions:
http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0112&L=indology&S=&P=3372
Any response from those interested?
Regards,
N. Ganesan
