X-Sender: naga ganesan@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 1); 10 Apr 2002 19:13:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 58794 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 19:05:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Apr 2002 19:05:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n8.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.92) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 19:05:06 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.137] by n8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Apr 2002 19:04:59 -0000
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:04:58 -0000
To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: vaLLuvar's kavari mA (was: Re: (fwd) A posting on hair)
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020410094250.00abbc40@...>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 367
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "naga ganesan"
X-Originating-IP: 12.13.248.4
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=9040551
X-Yahoo-Profile: naga ganesan
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17125
Have shown many citations where Tamil scholars
who study sangam texts writing about Untouchability
in those texts. Eg., U. V. Swaminathaiyar, Auvai
Duraisamy Pillai, V. S. Rajam, A. K. Ramanujan,
Hart, Zvelebil.
Question: Has Manivannan refuted these
great tamil experts' study of sangam texts
and particularly untouchability occuring in them?
Thanks,
N. Ganesan
