From bala@... Sat May 18 14:45:09 2002
Return-Path: X-Sender: bala@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 2); 18 May 2002 21:45:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 40245 invoked from network); 18 May 2002 21:45:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 May 2002 21:45:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sydney.net) (203.22.101.2) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 May 2002 21:45:08 -0000
Received: from bala (nas0ppp22.sydneywerks.com.au [203.22.103.32]) by sydney.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id HAA05911; Sun, 19 May 2002 07:48:29 +1000
X-Authentication-Warning: churchill.sydneywerks.com.au: Host nas0ppp22.sydneywerks.com.au [203.22.103.32] claimed to be bala
Message-ID: <003d01c1feda$d2a15a80$6201a8c0@bala>
To: Cc: , Subject: Fw: [tamil] COMMUNITY FORMATION AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN AUSTRALIA
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 07:43:45 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "Bala Pillai" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1292804
X-Yahoo-Profile: bala2pillai
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18118
----- Original Message -----
From: Indran To: Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: [tamil] COMMUNITY FORMATION AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN AUSTRALIA
> Folks,
> FYI .... http://www.aifs.org.au/institute/afrc7/giorgas.pdf
>
> Cheers,
> Indran
>
> Abstract
>
> An ethnic community’s social capital encompasses resources available to an
> individual
> through their membership in that community or group. It involves the
shared
> feelings of
> social belonging that enable groups to set up institutions and other
> networks that
> members can access. Social capital in these communities exists in the
> social relations
> among parents, between parents and their children and their relationship
> with the
> institutions of the community.
>
> This paper explores ethnic community formation and social capital among
six
> groups:
> Germans, Dutch, Hungarians, Poles, Italians and Greeks. It argues that
> social capital
> within the family is particularly important in overcoming deficiencies in
> other forms of
> capital; although it can only be successfully utilised when close
relations
> exist between
> parents and children. Thus cultures that place greater emphasis on the
> family and are
> collectivist in nature, such as Greeks and Italians, are more likely to
> utilise social
> capital. In contrast cultures that have an individualistic focus, for
> example, Germans and
> Hungarians, are more likely to under-invest in social capital.
>
> Moreover, social closure is important for social capital to be effectively
> facilitated.
> Closure helps facilitate norms and creates trustworthiness, allowing for
> the proliferation
> of obligations and expectations. In an open community, groups are less
able
> to sanction
> behaviour because of the absence of mobilising forces and reduced
consensus
> in regards
> to standards (Coleman 1988: S106-107).
>
> Overall, the findings of this paper suggest that ethnic community
formation
> has served
> as a positive strategy for immigrants in overcoming social isolation and
> economic
> difficulties by providing employment opportunities and a sense of familial
> surroundings
> within their own ethnic group. Social capital is utilised more effectively
> by groups with
> stronger cultural boundaries and a collective sense of identity.
>