X-Sender: bala@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 2); 1 Jun 2002 06:04:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 46746 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2002 06:04:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Jun 2002 06:04:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sydney.net) (203.22.101.2) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2002 06:04:19 -0000
Received: from bala (nas0ppp00.sydneywerks.com.au [203.22.103.10]) by sydney.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id QAA16202; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:11:07 +1000
X-Authentication-Warning: churchill.sydneywerks.com.au: Host nas0ppp00.sydneywerks.com.au [203.22.103.10] claimed to be bala
Message-ID: <00a601c20957$aab83980$d8bafea9@bala>
To:
Cc:
Subject: Not Taking Risks Is Itself A Large Risk
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:02:17 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "Bala Pillai"
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1292804
X-Yahoo-Profile: bala2pillai
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18372
Anpulla Thamil Innaiya Nanbargale,
Not taking enough risks*, is itself a large risk**.
Do you more agree or more disagree? Why?
anpudan../bala
bala@...
* that the times demand
**even though one may not be aware of it
