From bala@... Sat Jun 01 14:04:00 2002
Return-Path:
X-Sender: bala@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 2); 1 Jun 2002 21:04:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 33845 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2002 21:04:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Jun 2002 21:04:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.66) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2002 21:04:00 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.179] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2002 21:04:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 21:03:59 -0000
To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Book: Working Virtually: Managing People For Successful Virtual Teams & Orga
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20020601110749.007804cc@...>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 986
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "bala2pillai"
X-Originating-IP: 203.22.101.11
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1292804
X-Yahoo-Profile: bala2pillai
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18387

Anpulla Dr Jaybee,

Thanks for responding.

I meant the question for Lakshmi Srinivas. Would like to hear his
defence, if any, of his insinuations (without rationale or better
options) against the term "going corporate".

Lakshmi: If a given rosebush is "bad" because of its thorns, let us
know what the thornless rosebush is. And if there ain't none, why sow
seeds of doubt and leave us in confusion zone? Is not indecision, worse?

anpudan../bala
bala@...

--- In agathiyar@y..., jaybee wrote:
> At 02:13 AM 6/1/02 +0000, you wrote:
> >--- In agathiyar@y..., "lsrinivas" wrote:
> >
> >> Aha! Looks like this list is going corporate!

> >However, what's wrong with going corporate, pray tell? I trust you
> >must have sound thinking backing your utterances.

> Nothing wrong with corporatisation.
> I, as a managerial government servant, have taken
> part in the initial stages of 'Malaysia Incorporated' when
> the concept was launched.