X-Sender: sarabeswar@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 2); 14 Jun 2002 03:07:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 61136 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2002 03:07:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2002 03:07:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.81) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2002 03:07:19 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.164] by n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jun 2002 03:07:19 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 03:07:15 -0000
To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: kaNNOttam ennum kaziperum kArikai
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 633
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "sarabeswar"
X-Originating-IP: 202.152.1.146
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=81026296
X-Yahoo-Profile: sarabeswar
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18609
அன்புள்ள கணேசன்,
> Are there any suggestions why Mathuraapathi is not
> Miinaakshi?
கிடையாது.
> In parallel terms, I think
> Mathuraapathi mentioned in Cilappathikaram refers to
> Miinaakshi.
அடியேன் சொல்வதும் அஃதே! குழப்பம் வேண்டாம். நன்றி.
> BTW, the earliest accounts of Miinakshi in Greek sources
> does not mention Shiva.
mmm.. reminds me of a old joke! On Madurai & Chidambaram;-)
காரிகை, கழிபெரும் காரிகை ஆனது எப்படி என்று கேட்டிருந்தேனே!
அன்புடன்,
குமார்
