X-Sender: sarabeswar@...
X-Apparently-To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8 0 3 2); 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 28872 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.82) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.154] by n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:45:18 -0000
To: agathiyar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: kaNNOttam ennum kaziperum kArikai
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 654
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "sarabeswar"
X-Originating-IP: 202.154.23.98
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=81026296
X-Yahoo-Profile: sarabeswar
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18645
Dear Dr.Ganesan,
I request you to find out the answers for these simple questions:
1. How came kaNNOttam is given the adjective - kaziperum?
2. What is the intention of your trying to find out the exact name
Meenakshi in Cilambu when you yourself accept that the Mathurapathi
theyvatham is Meenakshi?
3. Is it anyway going to negate my commentary to kuRaL 571? I'd
rather prefer a direct approach. Please do so.
4. I am still waiting for your interpretation (from whatever source)
to kuRaL 245. I'll sure elaborate on that kuRaL ONLY after that.
Please do not give any rejoinder this time as you do normally.
Thanks a ton in advance!
Kumar
